top of page

Tight glycemic control versus standard of care after pediatric surgery.
Agus et al.N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1208-1219.

Reviewed by Dr. Jammie Ferrera MD, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles

Design of the study:

• Prospective, Randomized

Methods:

• 980 children, ages 0-36 months of age

•Undergone cardiopulmonary bypass

•Patients randomly assigned to tight glycemic control (targe glucose level of 80-110 mg per deciliter) or standard care in cardiac ICU

• Continuous glucose monitoring to detect impending hypoglycemia

• Primary outcome: rate of health care-associated infections

• Secondary outcome: mortality, length of stay, organ failure, hypoglycemia

Results:

• 440/490 (91%) children assigned to tight glycemic control group

• 9/490 (2%) assigned to standard care group

• Normoglycemia achieved earlier with tight glycemic control group than with standard care (6 hours vs. 16 hours, P<0.001)

• Normoglycemia maintained for a greater proportion of critical illness (50% vs 33%, P >0.001)

• No significant decrease in rate of health care associated infections

• Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly

• Tight glycemic control did not benefit high risk subgroups

• 3% of patients assigned to tight glycemic control had severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose <40 mg per deciliter)

Conclusions:

• Tight glycemic control can be achieved quickly and with a low hypoglycemia rate (3%) after cardiac surgery in children who undergo bypass.

• Tight glycemic control does NOT significantly alter infection rate, mortality, length of stay, organ failure as compared with standard care

Other interesting points:

• Mortality is an inadequate end point because in this patient population, deaths are largely attributed to underlying cardiac anatomy and quality of surgical repair.

• In contrast to previous trials involving adults, this study showed no benefit of tight glycemic control in critically ill children who had undergone cardiac surgery.

• This study was not blinded.

Take home message:

• Tight glycemic control (80 – 110 mg per deciliter) did not change the rate of health care associated infections, mortality, or length of stay in the cardiac ICU as compared to standard care.

www.pedsCA.com

Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia 

A central resource for clinicians 
Legal Disclaimer: Clinical data and statistical information contained in this website have been derived from information supplied by various contributors not affiliated with pedsca.com. Although we believe that the information supplied is generally correct, we do not assume any responsibility whatsoever for its accuracy. The data and information contained in the website are intended for use by persons possessing technical skill and knowledge. It's main purpose is to point the reader to the mentioned articles for reference. Consequently we assume no liability whatsoever for results obtained or loss or damage incurred as a result of application of the data or information presented.


www.PedsCA.com     Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia   ​

bottom of page